**Eclipse Correction...**

In

__The Earth Is Not Moving__(pp.207-214) there is a piece entitled "Eclipses" wherein I attempted to show that the direction of the moon’s shadow on the earth during a solar eclipse would be different in the heliocentric model from what it actually is, thereby revealing a classic flaw in the heliocentricity model.

Alas, it turns out that the direction is the same in both the geocentric and the heliocentric models, and I regret that error.

__There is still an upside for Biblical Geocentricity in this particular phenomena, however__. Consider the incredibly precise information about the location, direction, speed, expiration, etc., of these eclipse shadows that calculations

*based on a fixed earth had always provided before the Copernican Model was widely accepted.*But even more interesting--as even our encyclopedias tell us--precise calculations regarding eclipse shadow movements

__that are still relied upon today__are based upon a non-moving earth! This is quite astonishing, is it not? Here we have this singular example of indisputable mathematical precision--unfailingly certified with every solar eclipse--being based on a stationary earth which, of course, is universally declared to be non-existent and anathema to modern science!

Those who would say that there are mathematics based on a moving earth that give the same results are talking nonsense. Whatever different math symbols are used to fit a moving earth must ultimately be the same as the non-moving earth math

*Only one set of calculations can be the right one; any other would be*

__or the predictions would fail.__*different and would produce different results.*This simple fact still provides very strong evidence for the Biblical Model of a non-moving earth...whether the shadow goes the same way in both models or not.