(AND THUS DENIES THE "THEISTIC
COPERNICAN" POSITION AS WELL...)
"And God set them [sun, moon, and stars]
in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth...."
Notice: God SET them.... Now, inside our
so-called "solar" system, we have only the sun and the moon
(from the verse above). We KNOW the moon moves. Therefore, when God SET
IT "in the firmament", the inescapable meaning is that He set
it in motion on the track it follows. Thus, when He set THEM
in the firmament it is a grammatical imperative that He set the sun and
stars in motion ALSO on their tracks just like He set the moon in motion on its
"Then spake Joshua.... Sun, stand thou still upon
Gibeon, and thou moon, in the valley of Ajalon.
And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until
the people had avenged themselves upon their
So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and
hasted not to go down about a whole day."
Let's focus on the "MOON" in these verses:
Both Heliocentrists and Geocentrists agree that the
moon is moving around the earth. No argument on that. Then
we see that the Scripture says that Joshua commanded not
only the sun but ALSO THE MOON to stop, and that both obeyed the
command. He commanded both of them at the same time in the same breath
in the same sentence to stop their motion. He obviously accepted as fact
that the moon he was speaking to was a moon that was moving. Since,
therefore, he addressed both sun and moon together in his
command, it is a grammatical imperative that when he commanded a moving
moon to stand still, he was ALSO commanding a moving sun to stand still.
(A similar argument can be made for
the movement of the stars from Psalm 8:3 where "...the moon and the
stars, which thou hast ordained..." is written. "Ordained"--number
3559 is derived from the Hebrew #5087 which means "to place". The
moon that was placed moves; so, grammatically, would the stars.)
(Are you revisionist creationist leaders SURE you
want to insist that Joshua was telling the earth and not the sun to
stand still...and that the Holy Spirit of Truth caused the opposite
of the Truth to be recorded in God's Word?? What happened to
"God is not the author of confusion...."?!) [I Cor.14:33]
And what about:
"Behold, I will bring again the shadow of the
...ten degrees backward. So THE SUN RETURNED ten
by which degrees it was gone down...."
If something is moved "backward" it must
ipso facto have had a forward direction and movement. The shadow moved backward
on the sun dial...undeniably the opposite of the way it always moved. The
movement of the shadow is inseparable from the movement of the sun in
this verse for it says the sun returned. In short,
the sun's movement, not the earth's, is flatly declared here (as well as
in numerous other Scriptures listed (HERE
One may argue that God really meant that the earth
and not the sun is moving in all these Scriptures, that He just used a
"language of appearance" or "phenomenological language", or some such
polysyllabic excuse for accepting what "science falsely so-called" says
over what the Word of God says. Unfortunately, this hermeneutical
slight-of-hand can and does make the Creation days billions of years long
(HERE, p.2), the Noahic Flood
just a local flood, the virgin Mary just "a young girl",
"heaven" a superstitious myth, and on and on. Moreover, this
method of handling Scripture actually says that God has lied to us or is
so inept with words that He couldn't communicate a simple Truth about
whether it is the earth that goes around the sun or the sun that goes
around the earth.
Semantics too can be unyielding on this subject.
Let's take a hard look at the pronoun THOU in Joshua 10:12:
"Sun, stand THOU still...."
Strong's Hebrew Concordance #859 confirms what we
would expect, namely: "THOU" means "YOU".
So, semantically, what Joshua said was: "Sun,
YOU stand still...and moon, YOU stand still too. Sun, YOU stop over
Gibeon and moon, YOU stop over Ajalon."
Since Ajalon is only five or six miles away from
Gibeon, the sun and the moon are, cosmographically speaking, in the same
place, i.e., "in the midst of heaven".
Being in the same place, the moon is blocking out the
sun. Joshua's commands therefore, are ordering both orbs which are at
the point of full solar eclipse to move no further.
Eclipses were known and not feared in those days,
but--when in response to Joshua's commands which all heard (v.12)--a
moving moon stopped and stayed in front of a moving sun which suddenly
stood still "and hasted not to go down about a whole day", that was
another matter! Joshua's enemies were understandably freaked out of
their gourds (in the recent vernacular) and Joshua's soldiers
Clearly, the designation "YOU" applied by
God to a moving sun can not be and must not be twisted to say:
"YOU, Earth, stand still" or "YOU, Time, stand
still." One may want it to say one of those, but the Bible simply
does not say either one. (Bible scholars, of course, agreed on the plain
language until Newton's Kabbalist "math" persuaded most of them that man's science
had triumphed over Bible science and that they needed to adjust their
interpretation of Scripture accordingly).
Now, six-day Creationists are,
of course, well aware of the
stultifying effect that Theistic Evolutionists have on the Creationist
movement. Compromise with God's Truth is harder to combat than
out-and-out resistance, most would agree.
A classic expression of this fact was saved for the
very last frames of Hollywood's first version of Inherit The Wind
(about the Scopes "Monkey Trial" in Dayton, Tennessee in July
of 1925). After incessant and thinly disguised mockery of Bryan and
Bible fundamentalism in general throughout the movie, Darrow (played by
Spencer Tracy), alone in the courtroom in the final scene, picks up a
copy of the Bible in one hand and a copy of Darwin in the other. He
looks slowly back and forth at each book for a minute, thoughtfully
weighing this one, then the other one. Then, smiling broadly as if in
response to a revelation, he slaps Darwin and the Bible together,
gives them a long look and an affirmative head shake, tucks them under
his arm and walks out. Though not a word is spoken, his confident,
satisfied amalgamation of the two made the point: Put Darwin and the
And well could Hollywood revel in that silent visual
message...considering the acceptance of evolutionism in the world and
(more to the point) in the Christian Churches since the Scopes Trial in
1925! That movie and that scene were merely a dramatization of the
ability of the Theistic Evolutionist concept to bring discredit and scorn upon the
Bible as the source of Absolute Truth, while at the same time elevating
"science" to the role of Truth Giver, from thenceforward equal
or superior to the Bible and able to make It bow when the two conflict!
Fellow Creationist, I submit to you that the same
scene can be replayed substituting Newton's Principia for
Darwin's Origin of Species. Together with Copernicus' and Kepler's and Galileo's
earlier efforts (and Einstein's "relativity" and Sagan's
"exobiology" later), man's
books denying the plain geocentrism of Scripture were--as in the
Scopes Trial (HERE)--put together with the Bible and "Theistic Copernicanism"
was born! All that had to be changed was where the Bible says the sun
moves. Thereafter, we were all to understand that It really means the
earth moves when It says the sun moves. As with evolution, just change
the six-days of Creation to millions of years....Here, just change "sun"
to "earth". Quite simple really.
After sun and earth were switched by those trying to
accommodate both Bible and what they thought was "science",
the Churches gave in everywhere, just as most have given in to
evolutionism since Darwin, and particularly since the Scopes Trial.
The Christian Compromise with Copernicanism
established the one and only criterion needed for the success of Satan's
evolution myth in the world first, then the churches. The criterion?
Again, quite simple. Plain Scripture can and must be reworked to match
the claims of "science falsely so-called".
As a six-day "evening and morning"
Creationist, I, as one of you, submit that there is a way to undermine
the idolatrous non-secular science establishment upon which rests the
evolution myth you detest. If you are interested in restoring and
certifying Bible credibility, prayerfully consider: a) Getting informed
about the weakness and vulnerability of the heliocentric model, and: b)
Boldly attack that Bible-bashing model and watch the attack spread to
evolutionism (and all that is built upon both of those myths)!; c) New
evidence proving Copernicanism is the keystone of the Big Bang Paradigm
and that this evolutionary model of the universe is derived from the
Kabbala and thus cannot be financed in the USA under the Constitution
can be seen (HERE
- HERE -
If Creationists will stand up for God's Word on
geocentrism and refuse all compromise, they will see that their fears
of embarrassment, etc., are not from God (II Tim.1:7). Sir Fred Hoyle
and other prominent astronomers and physicists have admitted that the
geocentric model is just as good scientifically as the heliocentric
it is certainly a whole lot better Scripturally!
Indeed, a far more Biblical and scientific model
which shrinks the whole universe to less than one light
day's thickness and exposes all of modern cosmology as a pseudo-scientific sham
can be seen in a seven part series beginning
In short, the world has been systematically
indoctrinated to believe that the Bible-bashing earth-moving Copernican
model is a scientific fact beyond challenge. The truth of the
matter as any can confirm for themselves
is that not only the Copernican
Model--but the entirety of modern cosmology--is a massive deception and
totally vulnerable to exposure as such. Some links that will lead
to confirmation of that statement can be tested in the "Kabbala" and
"Size and Structure" series beginning
After a person finds out that evolutionism is a
contra-scientific and utterly goofy explanation for the ineffable
complexity of design and function of the entire plant and animal and
human life forms, Theistic Evolutionism becomes a cheap copout position
that is a lukewarm abomination to God (Rev.3:15,16).
Creationists know this is true.
Likewise--after prayerful consideration of the
Scriptures and the scientific and logical evidence supporting a
non-moving earth--it should be obvious to all Truth-seeking Bible
believers that the Theistic Copernicanism Compromise can fare no better
in God's sight than the Theistic Evolution Compromise.
stink! God's Absolute Truths cannot be compromised! Period. HE will have
no other gods--false science or otherwise--changing His Word and
usurping His Glory! That's the way it is. You can count on it.
Therefore, it is time for Bible Creationists to
either broaden their attack to include Copernicanism--and do so with a
whoop!--or recant on their belief in Bible inerrancy on the six-day
creation. A non-moving, geocentric earth is taught in the Bible just as
plainly as the six-day creation
HERE). Indeed, as
noted, the creation account makes it clear that there was no sun to
go around until the fourth day, yet there was light and darkness,
evening and morning (HERE)!
Let no Christian be counted amongst the various kinds
of Sun Worshippers that dot the historical record! "Solar
System", my foot! God created an "Earth System" not a
"Sun System"! Copernicanism makes the Sun the center, the
source of life. God makes the Earth the center, the springboard of His
Master Plan for eternal life. This "unmovable" (Ps.93:1) Earth
is the place where His only begotten Son would obediently carry out that
Plan. It is the place where "the New Earth" (Is.65:17;66:22;
Rev.21:1) will exist forever right here at the center of the universe
after this old earth has "been burned with fervent heat and
dissolved" and has "fled away" never to be found again
(Is. 65:17;II Pet. 3:10,12; Rev.20:11).
Time is up for the churches on this one
(HERE). By allowing
the takeover of the Physical Sciences thru their surrender to
Bible-bashing Copernicanism, the churches opened the door to the
takeover of the rest of man's "knowledge" by deceptions
disguised as "science"
(HERE). Now that this takeover extends thru
the Natural Sciences, the Social and Behavioral Sciences, the Arts,
Mathematics, and Religion, it is time for God's Judgment on the
churches (I Pet.4:17,18). Jesus "was manifested to destroy the
works of the Devil" (I John 3:8). These mega-deceptions are
"the works of the Devil". Truly, "the Devil's time is
short"! (Rev.12:12) "Come out of her [Babylon/confusion], my
people..." God says (Rev.18:4).
The "Church" is in
Babylon/confusion up to its steeple tops!
Creation is the cornerstone of Bible credibility.
(You can put that in italics and capitalize it:
CREATION IS THE
CORNERSTONE OF BIBLE CREDIBILITY.)
OK? A non- moving earth and a
six-day creation have been tampered with and credibility has all but
been destroyed as a result. God's Judgment begins with the restoration
of those foundational Truths of Genesis One in His churches FIRST.
(Rev.14:6,7: I Pet.4:17,18)
The call for God's people "to come out of
Babylon (i.e., "confusion":Rev.18:4) begins with exposing the
taproot of all modern Bible-bashing. That taproot is the Copernican lie.
None of us is stranger to deception. It's everywhere.
The only way out of deception is "to continue in God's Word".
Don't change it to fit clever deceptions. "Continue" in It.
That done, God promises: "Ye shall know the
Truth, and the Truth shall make you free (of Satan's lies)." (John
Go to: THE EARTH IS NOT MOVING web page
©1997 Marshall Hall
Last Modified -
Monday, February 20, 2012
INSEPARABLE CONCEPTS HISTORICALLY, PHILOSOPHICALLY, SPIRITUALLY, AND
On a cassette tape, Dr. DeYoung, an anti-geocentrist
"Creationist" says that everybody should "understand that
the Geocentric/Heliocentric controversy is completely separate from the
Creation/Evolution controversy". (DeYoung and Selbrede debate)
Some reasons why this is the exact opposite of the
1) The Scope's Trial record shows clearly that
Bryan's adversaries knew full well that Copernicanism and Darwinism were
inseparable concepts. The comparison was "used to flog Bryan"
several times and always to good effect for the evolutionists.(1)
2) All major encyclopedias and other historical
references regognize the ineffably great impact the Copernican
Revolution had on the course of history, the status of the Bible, and
the direction of science. That revolution turned ALL knowledge
upside down! (...Just as a counter-revolution against Copernicanism will
turn ALL knowledge upside down again [or RIGHT-SIDE UP]!!) The main
change caused by the Copernican Revolution was the exceptance of the
belief that "science" had disproven the Bible. And, if the
Bible could be wrong about the earth not moving, it could be wrong on
other aspects of the creation, on Noah's Flood, the Virgin Birth,
Thus, the Copernican Revolution began a process of
replacing the Bible with "science" as the new source of
Absolute Truth. Religion, business, politics, science, art...everything
had to get a new philosophical basis as "science" dethroned
the Bible with Copernican heliocentrism.
This new mindset was indisputably foundational
for the success of Bible-denying evolutionism that was the next thing
the Devil was to send down the road, attired fetchingly again as
"science". First the Physical "Sciences". Then the
Life "Sciences"! Once understood, denial of the symbiotic
connection inherent in this mindset can only be possible thru willful
historical and spiritual blindness (often coupled with pleas that the
focus has to be kept on evolution, again ignoring the fact that the two
are fundamentally inseparable!). This is a blindness that can no longer
be dismissed with a shrug amongst undeviating Bible Creationists today.
It is a blindness that is the root of all modern Bible -bashing.
Christians cannot continue to disregard and minimize this fact and be
indifferent toward it. Satan has been allowed to trick even the very
Elect on this one...and now God is calling His Own to take back that
which was stolen....
3) Kepler, Galileo, and Newton--called
"giants" who refuted geocentrism on the tape--were giants all
right! They never refuted anything except the Bible! It is a
demonstrable lie to say they proved geocentrism wrong. They did no such
thing, nor has anyone else. But, in a spiritual sense, they are still
giants, to be sure. They are the "giants in the land" that
today's Joshuas and Calebs amongst honest folk everywhere are called by
God to expose, knock off their pedestals, and drive out of the land
which they helped fortify against Bible Absolutism!
4) Take Kepler, of whom it is said:"...the
question of life's origin on earth fascinated Kepler.(2) And:
"adaptation of species...seemed as logical to Kepler as it did to
Charles Darwin over two centuries later when Darwin began to put
together his theory of evolution."(3) Not only do we see here a
clear and remarkably early connection of heliocentrism and evolutionism
in the mind of this "giant" of the Copernican movement, we can
see further along that he was the secret and unheralded father of the
fatuous excesses of gravitation theory 50 years before the credit went
to Newton (another "giant" who mutilated Scripture and
invented special "mathematics" to achieve his ends). More, it
is well established that Kepler believed there were evolved life forms
on the moon.(4) How is it then that this precocious EVOLUTIONIST is
acclaimed by Creationists today as a great man of God?!
Indeed, who is this Copernican-evolutionist Kepler
Dude (that ICR now lionizes with a book, and Dr. DeYoung calls a
"giant" who helped slay geocentrism)??
Well, Kepler's lineage and career are certainly of
interest to any serious Bible lover. Note these factual tidbits:
---His grandmother was raised by a "kinswoman
who had been executed for witchcraft".(5)
---His mother had forty-nine counts of
witchcraft officially brought against her. (Some of these were
doosies!) (6) Read:THE EARTH IS NOT MOVING for details....
---In January, 1616, officials in Wurttenberg charged
Johannes Kepler himself with practicing "forbidden
arts", i.e., witchcraft. (7)
---Kepler studied for the Lutheran Clergy, but was
always wrangling with the church authorities and was never allowed to
have a pulpit. (8)
---The pastor at Linz wouldn't allow Kepler to take
---While a university student in the late 1500's,
Kepler wrote a wild story about demons taking people to the moon so they
could watch the earth rotating. (10)
---Kepler got into a partnership with Tycho Brahe,
the dean of astronomers at that time, who was a bulwark against the
rising Copernican heresy. Brahe died rather suddenly (and conveniently
for the Copernican movement) pleading with Kepler not to use his
work to further Copernicanism (which plea was ignored, of course). (11)
---Etcetera, etcetera. (12)
5) Both Protestant and Catholic church leaders
remained pretty solidly opposed to Copernicanism for 150 years until
Newton's Principia was published in 1687. Then they began to
waffle. Still, there were plenty of holdouts thru the next century and
into the 1800's. (The R.C. Index didn't delete Copernicus until 1835.)
Scattered books and protests even continued until c.WWI, then virtually
died out, and only in recent years have begun to be seen and heard
again. Though Newton's book certainly did not prove Copernicanism, it
incorporated some new (or stolen from Leibnitz!) abstract mathematics
which served that purpose and rapidly gained acceptance at the
universities (just like Darwinism later).
6) Mathematics, utterly abstruse and esoteric, now
became the primary instrument in the hands of Copernicans. The secular
science establishment used this new priesthood of mathematicians to
soften up the universities first, and then the churches. Thus was the
way prepared for the acceptance of some real Bible-bashing by the coming
"scientific" substitute for the six-day Creation of man and
all else, viz., evolutionism.
Once Satan's counterfeit of God's Truth of an
earth-centered geocentric universe gained control of "higher"
education, the way was clear to foist his evolutionary counterfeit into
the corridors of academia with very little opposition! The real
spade work had already been done!
Copernicans Voltaire and Erasmus Darwin (Charles'
grandfather) were developing "ape-man" theories in the 1700's.
By the time lawyer Sir Charles Lyell came along with his uniformitarian
geology in 1830, evolutionary ideas were fermenting and fomenting in
many universities, awaiting only Darwin's "natural selection"
mechanism to uncork the bottle. Is there anyone anywhere who will not
give 100 to 1 odds that the earliest proselytizers of evolutionism were
not avowed Copernicans, having just received that great quantum leap in
"wisdom" from their grandfathers?? I can find none.
What I do find, is that Philosophers and other
intellectuals, all Copernicans (from Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibnitz et
al thru Kant and Hegel et al and on to Schopenhauer and Nietzsche et al)
had established the heliocentric cosmology so solidly over a 300 year
period in the universities and publication circles that even the famous
scientist von Humboldt was cowed into silence. Just before Darwin's book
came out in 1859, Humboldt said: "I have known too for a long time,
that we have no arguments for the Copernican system...." Still,
fear of "scorn of a thoughtless multitude" prevented him from
saying anything. (13)
Thus, secure from any credible attack on their
Copernican "science" front, the new Darwinian
"science" offensive could then link hands with that
"established scientific truth" and forge boldly ahead toward
the goal of pushing the Bible completely off stage as a repository of
In all this, as many of you know, Ernst Haeckel was a
powerful force early in the establishment of Darwinism. This biological
note about Herr Haeckel succintly tells what happened and why it
happened: "Ernst Haeckel wedded the idea of classical physics
[Copernicanism] with the new Darwinian history of nature to form a
comprehensive materialist cosmology, or `anti-theology'..."
This "comprehensive materialist
cosmology" is what Creationists today are up against and, excepting
a handful, they do not know it! Evolutionism does NOT stand
alone as a Bible-wrecking, contra-scientific deception, Satanically
conceived. Oh no! Evolutionism is historically, philosophically,
scientifically, and spiritually WEDDED TO a previously conceived
Bible-wrecking, contra-scientific deception called Copernicanism! The
Creation "movement" today denies or ignores this wedded union
and thus is not 1/50th the threat to Satan's kingdoms in this world that
it can and should be.
Fellow Creationists: It's wake-up time!!
And all this is not the half of it!
There was another "ism" that was born out
of the Copernican mindset but was floundering until evolutionism began
to take hold. That was Communism. As evolutionism sank securely into
university curriculums (and was soon augmented by evolution-based
Freudianism in the Behavorial "sciences"), Marxist Communism
took on new life and in a mere generation and a half had conquered
Russia. So an officially atheistic state was established which was
referred to in the early days as the application of "Scientific
Socialism" to government and economics. What was this
"scientific" base anyway?
Well, most Creationists know by this time that
Biological Evolutionism is an indispensable foundational principle of
"Scientific Socialism" (which includes not only Communism, but
the infinitely more slinky idea of "Humanism"). Most have
heard that, after reading Darwin, Marx said: "This is the book
which contains the basis in natural history for our
view."(15) When Marx finished his first volume of Das Kapital
he offered to dedicate it to Darwin. Darwin's book had given God
"the death blow", he exulted to Lassalle. What he and Engles
et al had created out of the anti-Bible secular philosophy made possible
by the triumph of Copernicanism in the physical sciences, was now
certified by Darwin in the natural sciences! Atheistic Communism was now
fully equipped by both the physical and natural sciences to conquer the
world with a political and economic system which openly stated that
Bible Christianity was moribund at last and would soon be put out of its
misery by an enlightened "science"-based movement. Philosopher
Nietzsche boasted in the 1880's: "God is dead; we have killed him
with our science!"
While knowlegeable Creationists have known about the
Communist-Socialist-Humanist dependency upon evolutionism, they have not
generally known or thought about the Copernican connection to the same
"isms". It is now time to understand this connection! It
is now time to understand how Copernicanism PAVED THE WAY for the
acceptance of Darwinism, and how Darwinism, in turn supplied the basis
for conquest of the Social and Behavioral "sciences" (and the
Arts, Mathematics, and Religion). It is time to understand that
Communism and Humanism are equally dependent upon that other
foundational "scientific" principle that goes hand in glove
with evolutionism. That pre-evolutionary principle was and is
Does someone say they aren't convinced that the very
heartbeat of Communist and Humanist ideology is the anti-Bible moving
earth concept we call Copernicanism??
Let such a one lend an ear to what a gathering of
Communist scientists in London in 1931 were saying. They knew that their
system absolutely depended on a conviction that nothing in the universe
can be motionless. (If anything could be motionless, then the earth
could be as the Bible says, and the game would be over!)
Note these quotes from that formal gathering of
---"Modern physics rejects absolute
---"Teaching the self-movement of matter
received its full development in the dialectical materialism of Marx,
Engles, and Lenin."(17)
---F. Engels established "one of the basic
theses of dialectical materialism, i.e., the inseparability of
movement from matter...."(18)
Notice the specialized role of Mathematics in all
---"This special mathematics--the tensor
analysis, the matrix calculus...has for the greater part been
created by the physicists themselves." (19)
---"For Mathematics there is only one way out:
conscious, planned reconstruction on the basis of materialist
dialectics" [i.e., atheist philosophy resting on Copernicanism and
---"Proceeding from the Leninist theory...we in
the Soviet Union shall reconstruct the Mathematical sciences...."(21)
The fact that the Copernican cosmology underpinning
Communism and Humanism is erected totally on phony "reconstructed
Mathematics" from Copernicus thru Einstein to NASA's "virtual
reality" deceptions is a fact that must be grasped without further
delay. All who are really interested in exposing and bringing down the
evolution myth must begin: a) To depend on the God behind the geocentric
Word; b) Eschew their fears of "science falsely so-called";
and: c) Get informed and begin to attack the Copernican taproot of these
deceptions masquerading as "science".
It's God's Word, after all, and He will not have it
return to Him void on this Creation matter indefinitely! (Isaiah 55:11)
But Soviet Communism is finished, someone objects,
"so what's the big deal about what their scientists said?"
The problem, Creationist friend, (not to ignore the
little matter of the rise of Communist China to superstate status...) is
that Humanism is in place all over the world today and Humanism has
exactly the same roots in Copernicanism and Darwinism as Soviet
It's the same Bible destroyer as before, only
now--outside China Cuba, N.Vietnam, and N. Korea--wearing a different
hat. The whole world is ready to unite under a Humanist New World Order
and usher in a Humanist New Age. The cards are dealt. It's a done deal!
And the real purpose, the hidden agenda, of this
incipient (and insidious) cardboard utopia about to descend on all of
Simply this:...A one world religion where all beliefs
except Bible Christianity will be allowed.... ("Hate
Crime" laws--now on the books and steadily broadening their scope
toward this end--will be the instrument used to criminalize New
Testament Christianity in the pantheistic New World Order.)
1 - Ray Ginger, Six Days Or Forever? Oxford U.
2 - John Lear, Kepler's Dream. (Full text and
notes. U. of CA, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1965), Footnote, p.7.
3 - Ibid.
4 - Ibid.
5 - Ibid., p.3.
6 - Ibid., pp.31,35.
7 - Ibid., p.34.
8 - Ibid., p.4.
9 - Ibid., p.33.
10 - Ibid., p.5.
11 - Ibid., p.7 (And: Fred Hoyle, Astronomy and
Cosmology. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1975, p.416.
12 - Marshall Hall, The Earth Is Not Moving, Fair
Education Foundation, Inc., 1991, Cornelia, GA pp.44-63.
13 - C. Schoeppfer, The Earth Stands Fast.
(Charles Ludwig, Printer, N.Y., 1900), p.59.
14 - Encyclopedia Britannica, 1976 Ed., Vol.16,
Macropedia; p. 380.
15 - J.D. Bernal, Marx and Science, (New York;
International Publishers, 1952), p.17.
16 - Dr. Joseph Needham, Fwd., "Marx's Theory on
the Historical Process", Science At The Crossroads. (London:
Frank Cass and Co., Ltd., 1971), p.189.
17 - Ibid.
18 - Ibid., p.188.
19 - Ibid., pp.215,216.
20 - Ibid., p.225.
21 - Ibid., p.229.