The Concept of A Rotating Earth Orbiting the Sun
Is Both The Pseudo-Scientific Foundation and
The Achilles Heel of Modern Kabbala-based Cosmology
Could the Kabbalist Cosmological Paradigm of a 15 billion year old universe with all its layered assumptions have been brought to its present state of global acceptance without there first having been a change of the non-moving Earth of the Bible into the rotating and orbiting earth of "Copernican" heliocentricity?? In other words, has the whole development of an evolution-based Origins Concept of all that exists in heaven and Earth been dependent upon a belief that the Earth is moving? And is that evolution-based Concept impossible if--as the Bible teaches and true science confirms--the Earth is not moving? Letís see....
First of all, we recall from Part II, p.2 that Ben HaKana,a 1st century Kabbalist using a 42 letter name for God estimated a 15 billion year old universe. Also (pp.2,3), we recollect that Kabbalist Nachmanides outlined Relativity, a Big Bang, and an Expanding Universe (and Zionism and Dispensationism! HERE - HERE) in the 13th century. Then, in that same century, that same Nachmanides also revived the rotating, orbiting Earth concept of Aristarchus from the 3rd century BC.
Copernicus, of course, is given the credit for launching the earth moving heliocentricity model with the publication of his book in 1543. Butitís quite clear that Nachmanides was reviving the same idea three centuries earlier. Why, one wonders, is the launching of this Bible-torpedoing concept called "The Copernican Revolution" rather than "The Nachmanian Revolution"?
One answer--sufficient unto itself--is at hand: As with the contents of the Talmud (HERE) , Kabbalist writings have always been tightly guarded secrets from the non-Rabbinic world. Occasionally down through the centuries some of those contents became known(and usually played a role in the sufferings experienced by lay Jews in many countries). But it has only been in very recent times that a computer-generated information avalanche has exposed the scathingly anti-Bible teachings of the Talmud and Kabbala that can not easily be sluffed off or explained away.
No strangers to hidden, secretive stuff, the Pope and several Catholic heavyweights, nevertheless, did not immediately squelch Copernicusí book in 1543. The concept was spread all around rather freely for over 70 years before the Roman Church took a stand behind Scripture and all that was actually known scientifically. So the "Copernican" Revolution was percolating all over Europe and beyond with minimal official resistance for a half century and more. True, the nascent Protestant Movement under Luther and later Calvin and others opposed the concept vigorously and continued the fight--as did Rome--until the Newtonian gravitational sorcery slowed the objections to an occasional protest.(There is some good stuff in Michael Whiteís book: Isaac Newton: The Last Sorcerer, 1 but he could have gone much further by tying Newtonís otherwise incongruous 30 year fixation with alchemy to the Kabbalistís alchemical concept of turning base non-human golems into humans...Part IV, p.4: HERE....) Aside from being secretive information known only to Kabbalist insiders, the stage was not properly set for the reception of so radical an attack on the Bible in Nachmanidesí day as it was in Copernicusí day. A re-birth of ancient Greek and Roman pre-Christian and anti-Christian culture had to sweep the ruling classes of 14th and 15th century Europe to prepare the way. By the time Copernicusí book was published near mid 16th century, the Renaissance had already reached its peak. Riding the first waves of the Copernican Revolution in the 1550's, 60's, and 70"s was Kabbalist Isaac Luria. He understood how fellow Kabbalist Nachmanidesí 13th century Big Bang Paradigm could actually be built upon the Copernican basis, and he promptly tied that understanding in with Kabbalist Ben HaKanaís 1st century calculation of a 15 billion year old universe...which only another Kabbalist would be privy to. (At first, it was not clear to me why Luria is given so much credit for "prophesying" Big Bangism 400 years ahead of its establishment. After all, Nachmanides had the same idea over 300 years before Luria did and he also understood that a Big Bang Cosmology could never be built without first establishing a contra-Biblical heliocentric foundation. Luria, however, had the advantage of living at a time when a Gentile Churchman (Copernicus) would push that foundational moving-earth concept onto the world stage. The fact that Luria virtually pounced upon connecting the dots in the Rabbis HaKana and Nachmanidesí Big Bang Cosmological Paradigm 400 years before it was brought to fulfillment attests to the fortuitous launching of the necessary Copernican foundation to that Paradigm during his lifetime much more than any "prophetic" ability attached to him. Given the prospects of a "scientifically" accepted rotating earth model--and fortified with a centuryís-old secret plan to destroy Bible Credibility by destroying its "Origins Scenario"--the path was cleared for Kabbalic "science" to conquer the Life Sciences with "evolutionism". That done, Social and Behavioral "Sciences" and "Educational Psychology" and evolution based Christianity could proceed to transvaluate Christian morals and ethics until they conformed to Talmud/Kabbala morals and ethics (HERE), a task now also nearly completed....).
Although Nachmanides understood that a heliocentricity model was the required first step on the road to legitimizing a relativistic, big bang, expanding universe cosmological fantasy which would establish eons of evolutionism and destroy all Bible credibility, he didnít have the mathematical mechanism attached to Copernicanism that gave it "scientific" status. Luria was the right man in the right place at the right time(1534-1572) to declare something like this in the Kabbalic Inner-Sanctum: "Now we have the mechanism that can make the Cosmology of the sages work!"...in much the same way 300 years later that Karl Marx could write to Lassalle that Darwinís book had given "the death blow to God"2 and further exult: "Darwinís book...serves me as a basis for the class struggle [communism] in history."3
The heliocentricity mechanism was the only concept that could remove the Earth from its glorious physical and spiritual centrality in a God-created universe and pave the way for evolutionismís success. Barely three and a half generations after Darwin, a Saganesque Kabbalic Big Bang Expanding Universe 15 billion years old and 15 billion light years thick would be triumphant over Biblical Creationism forever. Yee Hah already, you Christian schmucks!Really, it was the only mechanism that could consign the Earth to being just one of billions of cosmic accidents produced in the "Origins Scenario" of esoteric Kabbalism whereby an explosion of a "substanceless substance" 15 billion years ago could become the accepted "scientific" explanation for the creation of all that exists and simultaneously destroy Bible Credibility from Genesis to Jesus.
There is no escaping this rudimentary fact that a revival of Aristarchusí 3rd century B.C. heliocentricity model of a rotating, sun-orbiting Earth provided the only key that could release the occult scientism that would culminate in the establishment of the Kabbalist Origins Scenario now certified in textbooks worldwide. Equally inescapable is the conclusion that all evolutionary mythology--from the now- discarded Darwinian "primeval soup" nonsense to todayís extraterrestrial Panspermia goofiness (HERE)--also required for its success the previous victory of heliocentricity over Biblical geocentrism. The success of Copernicanism has made all the rest possible...as Marx, Engels, Freud, Einstein, Gamow, Penzias, Sagan, et al realized, even if Christian Kabbalists do not. Just as surely as the whole mountain of false-science manufactured deception could only be erected on a moving Earth model, just so surely can the whole Cabal be brought to naught only by exposing the truth about that baseless model.
Lest one think that Talmudic/Kabbalic Jews are being singled out as the only pre-Copernican advocates for a moving Earth "Solar System" and the only ones promoting the Model after it was served up to the world in 1543, mention should be made of Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa(1401-1464). After becoming interested in astronomy in 1444 Nicholas "purchased sixteen books" on the subject, and some equipment of the day, and began to theorize suspiciously like Nachmanides before him. For example, "...he claimed that the Earth moved round the Sun. He also claimed that the stars were other suns and that space was infinite. He also believed that the stars had other worlds orbiting them which were inhabited...."4
Whether any of those "sixteen books" included the heliocentric concept of Nachmanides from the Kabbala a couple of centuries earlier, it is doubtful that we will ever know. But since a Cardinal would have had access to rare writings that were available in his time before the printing press was invented, itís likely that he knew of Nachmanidesí similar concepts. Certainly Copernicus(1473-1543) -- himself a Churchman also--is known as early as 1514 to have been toying with the model that later bore his name. Almost certainly Copernicus was aware of Nicholasí (and even Nachmanís) beliefs. For sure and certain he was aware of the heliocentricity hypothesis of Aristarchus (310-230 BC), for it is known that he gave credit for his indebtedness to that pre-Christian pagan in the prologue of his book...a note that was dropped from the publication itself in 1543.
So, not only Talmudic/Kabbalic Jews were pre-Copernican advocates for heliocentricity, and they certainly were not alone in pushing for its acceptance after 1543. Surely the pro-Copernican zeal of Protestant Kepler and Catholic Galileo et al equaled any that Kabbalist Isaac Luria et al may have held...albeit not secretly.Regardless of who its proponents were--the steady replacement of Biblical Geocentrism with Copernican Heliocentricity accomplished five major things: 1) It torpedoed Bible Credibility amidships. 2) It set the stage for the Darwinian Revolution and all its offspring. 3) It provided a license to a Theoretical Science Establishment to subvert True Observational Science and to become the source of "truth" for "enlightened" people. 4) It sanctified the use of increasingly arcane/Cabalist mathematics and fraudulent use of technology to support its claim to be "science". 5) It provided a way to cleverly move manís concept of knowledge--anchored in his concept of the Origin of all things--from being Bible Based to being Kabbala based by presenting the change as something demanded by "secular science" with no "religious" connections.
A Moving Earth Is Indispensable To The Big Bang Paradigm
As we have seen, there were proponents of a rotating, orbiting Earth writing on that subject well before Copernicus(Kabbalist Nachmanides, 13th century...Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa, 15th century). Weíve seen also that the concept of "other worlds" with "extraterrestrial life forms" was stirring before Copernicusí book came out in 1543.
Once, however, that Copernicanism achieved lift-off, others began to embrace similar ideas about extraterrestrialism. Kepler provides one of the better known examples. Writing of alleged moon dwellers, he said that they: "...have no settled dwellings, no fixed habitation: they wander in hordes over the whole globe in the space of one of their days...then they creep into caves...since we regard the spotted parts of the moon as cultivated, we shall assume that wild and barbaric bands of robbers inhabit the rough and mountainous territory...."5 [Kepler: HERE, p.2, -HERE] From those early musings about extraterrestrial life forms following the spread of the Copernican Revolution, we can see how the two concepts are interdependent and supportive of each other. Not even earth-bound evolutionism could have gotten off the ground masquerading as "science" if the Earth had remained stationary with the sun going around as the Bible teaches. It is no different now in the 21st century when a ubiquitous theme about evolved extraterrestrial life forms has swamped all media genres. Copernicanism is still the platform on which the whole Kabbalist Evolutionary Space Show "revolves around", as it were.
Is it any wonder that the moving Earth "fact" is a "hands-off scientific truth" in the world today??! Is it any wonder that a non-moving Earth is a "hands-off Biblical error" in the Churches today??!This is the one single concept that will brook no challenge, secular or religious! Even professed Bible Fundamentalist Creationist Leaders stonewall against any attempt to bring them into the battle to defend plain stationary-earth, moving sun Scriptures (HERE) and help expose the demonstrable symbiotic connection of Copernicanism to Evolutionism. Rather, these Leaders actually promote the heliocentricity model HERE -HERE -HERE).
[This recent example from ICRís Dr. Henry Morris ("Days of Praise", 2-5-03) takes the cake. Quoting the famous "Sun, Stand Thou Still..." passage in Joshua 10-12-14, he says: "He who made the earth could cause the earth to cease its rotation, to give His people victory. There is nothing too hard for the God of creation! Two pages later Proverbs 30.6 is quoted: "Add thou not unto His words, lest He reprove thee, and thou be found a liar." I cannot believe he realizes what he is doing....But wait! Here are two more overt promotions of an anti-Bible (and anti-science!) moving earth: 9/1/04: "Then He set the sun and moon in the sky and made the earth...to rotate on an axis....Next, He placed the stars in the far heavens in various locations and combinations, and the earth to orbiting around the sun...."9/22/04: "...This required the establishing of earth's annual orbit around the sun...." This habit of altering Scripture to fit Baptist fundamentalist doctrine is a bad habit, one that is guaranteed to distort Biblical eschatology to a point where the Creationist leadership actually is standing in the way of breaking down the extraterrestrial evolutionism that has become the foundation of terrestrial evolutionism. Another example of this practice of altering Scripture just a little bit and creating a total distortion of eschatology has to do with changing the Biblical teaching of a New Heavens and a New Earth (HERE) to "Renewed". 11/30/04: H. Morris (d. 2-'06) writes: "...The new heavens and new Earth--that is, the renewed heavens and Earth..." And again: The Earth must yet be purged by fire..., but it will be renewed in righteousness...." (Be sure to check that New vs Renew Essay: (again: HERE).
All the excuses for this reckless mauling of Scripture are givenHERE, pp.2-5 including the most obvious one, viz.: Relentless indoctrination has done its job and Brother Henry believes that heliocentricity is as factual as air. The reality is that those who can genuinely examine the subject without bowing to false church doctrines can know that a moving earth has never been proven and that the Biblical Model in the Seven Part "Size and Structure of the Universe..." Series and other links answer all the known phenomena. The Creationist refusal to follow plain non-moving earth Scripture (HERE) is a vital aspect of reality about which the public never hears (HERE).
All that aside, the final understanding that needs to sink in here is why modern day Kabbalist Kosmology could never have been pulled-off as it has been without the success of the Copernican Revolution; and, conversely, how that Satanic Counterfeit--and all that is riding on it!--must and will be unmasked and fall(II Thess. 2:3; Rev. 17:14) when the reality about the non-moving Earth of the Bible is supernaturally forced on the churches first (HERE), then the rest of the world (R.17:14).
Hearken well to this fact: Modern day cosmology exists solely on the Kabbalic principles that Heliocentrism, Relativism, Big Bangism, and an Expanding Universe define a cosmos that is 15-16 billion years old and has at least a 15 billion light year radius. That is todayís textbook Cosmological Paradigm straight up with no chaser.
These facts follow:1) That Paradigm could never have been brought to pass without the gradual victory of the Copernican Model of a rotating, orbiting Earth over the Biblical Model of an immovable Earth with the sun going around daily. 2) The Paradigm will crash and burn when the world learns: a) That heliocentricity is merely a mathematical model that proves nothing. b) That there is no observational (i.e., "scientific") proof that the Earth rotates or orbits the sun. c) That the non- moving Biblical model of a stationary Earth can account for all known phenomena. d) That the heliocentricity hypothesis is a necessary assumption for all the layers of deep space hypotheses piled upon it. e) That the now-ruling hypothetical assumption in Cosmology today--the Big Bang Paradigm--is nothing more nor less than the fulfillment by a Theoretical Science Establishment of an Origins Scenario taken directly out of the religion of occult Kabbalism wherein Rabbinic leaders outrank Bible prophets and whose goal for two thousand years has been the destruction of Christianity. f) That this all boils down to an apocalyptic High Noon Shootout between these two religions that brings about a war (Rev. 17:14) which unmasks Satanís empire of Babylon and divides the world into his overt worshippers (Rev.13:4) and those who get on Godís side (v.7).
It is immediately obvious that the two Creation Models (Biblical and Kabbalic) are intrinsically irreconcilable, in spite of the Kabbalist mumbo-jumbo of Dr. Schroeder et al(Part VI: HERE). Dr. Sís Kabbalist Origins Scenario involves: a) A 15.75 billion year starting date for the universe; b) Any kind of g-d or no g-d you want; c) A mountain of oral tradition contradicting the Bible and erasing Jesus; d) A universe billions of light years thick; And; e) A relativistic concept of time.
By contrast, the Biblical Origins Scenario involves a literal Six-Day Creation, a Sovereign God with an eternal Plan for "Whosoever Will" without discrimination; a Plan that culminated with Jesusí obedience on the cross and is set forth in Two Covenants with no oral tradition. The Biblical universe is also a temporary one and just thick enough to get the numbered and named stars around the Earth daily (Part I & 4 of seven parts: HERE - HERE), and has a non-relativistic concept of time.
All talk of their being no problem reconciling "science" and religion is pure hypocritical balderdash... disguised, of course, as tolerant good-will, etc.What people must get through their heads is that there is no "science" involved in this deceptive spiritual enterprise. None. What is being called "science" in this hostile takeover of Christianity is straight out of the openly anti-Christ religion of occult Kabbalism...enabled by a Talmudic license to stop all who resist the takeover. So everybody needs to get that much clear just for starters! Todayís Cosmological Model that rules the academic world and every media outlet is nothing more nor less than the fulfillment of the Origins Scenario--i. e., the "Creation Scenario"--from a "holy book" called the Kabbala belonging to the religion of Pharisaic Judaism. That Origins Scenario--that "Creation Scenario"--has been brought to pass through the application of Talmud-endorsed lying, cheating, and hypocrisy applied through Virtual Reality deceptions (HERE), and fraudulent use of technology (HERE - HERE - HERE) by a Theoretical Science Establishment upheld by all the above and by occult mathematics (HERE, p.9 - HERE).
"Secular Science" is not deciding this Origins Issue.What is at issue is religion against religion, i.e., the g-d of Talmud/Kabbala against the God of the Bible. (HERE)
If one insists that the issue is about "Science" when referring to the mutually exclusive Creation Models of the Kabbala and the Bible, one needs a definition of what "Science" is. All dictionaries agree that the root word of "Science" is the Latin scire which means: "to know". There is one uncomplicated way of knowing something, and that way is to observe it and to note that no matter how many times that something is observed it always does the same thing. Observable and repeatable = Known, and Known = "science". All else invites deception.
There is a foundational premise underlying both the Kabbalic Kosmological Model and the Biblical Cosmological Model. The Foundational Premise of the Kabbalic Kosmological Model is a daily rotating Earth, annually orbiting the sun. The Foundational Premise of the Biblical Cosmological Model is a stationary Earth with the sun going around daily. As world-class astronomer/physicist Sir Fred Hoyle (d.2001) et al admit, "both models explain the phenomena"(HERE). (Beginning with Part I HERE and going through Part VII will be found "The Size and Structure of the Universe According to the Bible and Non-Theoretical Science". Taken together with these Kabbala links and other web page essays, both the true nature of the universe and the great deception covering up that truth will impact the mind in a way that cannot be dismissed.)
So, since both models cannot be true, one must be true and one false. The Earth cannot be rotating and orbiting the sun and also be stationary with the sun going around it. One is true "Science" and the other is false "Science".
"Seeing is believing" is an old adage that upholds the observational requirement for anything that is defined as known, i.e., as "scientific". If no one has ever, ever, ever actually seen a "hypothetical something" about the Cosmos take place, can that "hypothetical something" be "known"? Obviously not. Can that "hypothetical something" be truly "scientific" if it is not known? Not according to "something" called a dictionary. It can be "science " falsely so called which causes man to err"(I Tim.6:20,21), but it can not be "true science". [Todayís "science" is Orwellian doublespeak.] (These three links contain all the information required to destroy the evolution monopoly in public education in the USA: HERE- HERE-HERE.)
Mindful of all that, the defining question about the Copernican Model is this: Has anyone throughout all of history ever "observed" the Earth to move... either rotationally or orbitally? The answer is No. People think it has been observed, but it has not, and anyone who says otherwise can quickly discover their error. But what about navigation and satellites, and the mathematical models of the moving earth, etc.? Donít they "prove" the Earth is moving? Not the least. All those things work perfectly well with a non-moving Earth and geocentric math. In fact, boiled down, all so-called heliocentric math is the same as geocentric math or it wouldnít work...as is admitted when calculating the precise features of solar eclipses.
So, by definition, the Copernican Heliocentricity Model of a universally accepted rotating, orbiting Earth is, in reality, an unobserved, unknown, and unscientific deception. It is not true "Science"--which is a wonderful thing--but is "science falsely so called" for the simple reason that it is built entirely upon these seven assumptions which contradict what is observed and therefore what is known and therefore what is "Science". Note:
Eclipse Phenomena Reveals Heliocentricity Model
To Be Built Purely On Assumptions
Note these seven assumptions required by the Helio Model that enables it to account for the precise phenomena required in Solar Eclipses:
1) The Sun must cease its observed daily spiral orbit pattern around the Earth and become stationary relevant to the Earth and the Moon.We must assume that what everyone who has ever lived has seen with their own eyes--the Sun rising in the East and setting in the West--is not truly what is happening. Rather what no one has ever seen--a stationary Sun--is what we are told is scientific truth. 2) The Earth must rotate West to East ccw (counterclockwise) on an "axis" every 24 hours at an equatorial speed of c. 1040 MPH. This is purely and simply an assumption required by the Helio Model that has never been witnessed nor experienced by anyone who has ever lived. It is an assumption that flies in the face of all observed phenomena--birds, clouds, artillery, jet time whether E or W; etc. 3) The Earth must orbit the Sun ccw annually at an average speed of c. 67,000 MPH. This is a composite assumption dependent upon the previous never witnessed assumptions that the Sun is stationary and the Earth is rotating. All experimental efforts to prove this orbital motion of the Earth have failed, and there have been hundreds of them. 4) The Earth must be tilted on an "axis" at 23.5 degrees as it orbits the Sun. Again, this is a necessary and contrived assumption for explaining the seasons that is built upon the previous assumptions of a stationary Sun, a daily rotating Earth, and an annual orbit of the Earth around the Sun. The Geo Model of the Sun orbiting the Earth annually from the Tropic of Capricorn to the Tropic of Cancer-- just as it is observed to do--is a much more elegant explanation of the seasonal changes on Earth. And, of course, it fits the Scripture demands of a non-moving Earth and a moving Sun. 5) The Earthís atmosphere must be assumed to be just an airy extension of the alleged rotating Earth. This "atmospheric envelope", as it is called--allegedly is mysteriously connected to the Earthís surface and extends to at least 22,200 miles high where the mis-named "geosynchronous satellites" roost [and even to the end of the Earthís gravitational field 216,000 miles out, some would say]. This "airy extension" is assumed to have the uncanny ability to synchronously adjust the speed of any object going through it--birds, clouds, helicopters, jets, missiles, "geosynchronous satellites"--to the alleged rotational speed of the Earth. This assumption is said to account for such anomalies as a jet flying at 500 MPH due west between airstrips 3000 miles apart on the Equator at 40,000 ft. and arriving in six hours regardless of the alleged eastwardly rotation of the Earth beneath it at over 1000 MPH for six hours...which rotation would bring the westward destination on the Earthís surface toward the jet twice as fast as the plane is going. On this flight the jet will have gone 3000 miles westward and the Earth will have rotated 6000 miles eastward. Then, according to the "envelope" assumption, turning back and flying due east over the same distance at the same speed will require the same six hours regardless of the alleged eastwardly rotation of the Earth beneath the plane in the same direction at over 1000 MPH for six hours. The Earth on this return flight has allegedly moved 6000 miles in six hours and the plane 3000 miles; yet the airstrip is where it was on the first flight and not 3000 miles further east. All such denials of the only obvious explanation for such ridiculous assumptions is that the Earth is not moving. But, we canít have that, now can we? Therefore, we must postulate and assume that there is indeed "an atmospheric envelope" which rotates with the Earth just as if were something solid nailed securely to the surface and rotating with it. Moreover, this incomprehensible but necessary "assumption/fact" of the universally believed and sacrosanct Helio Model is amazingly unperturbed by the Earthís assumed orbit around the assumed stationary Sun at c.67,000 MPH, or its assumed orbit around the Milky Way Galaxy at c. 500,000 MPH, or its assumed exit from the assumed Big Bang explosion at c. 660,000,000 MPH....
("..There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact."6 You tell Ďem, Mark Twain!) 6) The Moon must change its observed E to W cw motion around the Earth [every 24 hours and 52 minutes average] to a W to E motion around the Earth every 29.5 days. This complete reversal of the Moonís direction is yet another indispensable assumption required by the stationary Sun assumption, the revolving Earth assumption, the orbiting Earth assumption, and the tilted Earth assumption which make up the Helio Model. Although each and every one of these assumptions is necessary to make a mathematical model that answers the appearances, not a single one has a factual basis. 7) The observed motion of the Stars around the Earth nightly must cease in the Helio Model. Because of the billions of light year distances to the furthermost stars claimed by modern cosmology--especially in the Kabbalistic Big Bang Paradigm--this assumption of non-moving stars is counted as the trump card that will defeat any revival of the non-moving Earth Geo Model of the Bible. Yet, note this well: This is a claim just like the others that is wholly dependent upon the acceptance of the multiple indispensable assumptions of the Helio Model, especially the rotating Earth-stationary Sun--reverse Moon direction assumptions. Given the ineffably profound transvaluation of every aspect of modern manís "knowledge" (HERE) that the "Copernican Revolution" instigated, and given the obviously indescribable havoc that would result from exposing its purely assumptive construction (in clear violation of unfailing observational evidence), is there anyone so naive left in the world who could not readily agree that no means would be spared to prevent such an exposure from occurring? Having answered that rhetorical question truthfully, then shall the obvious means to preserving the trump card of a universe so vast that the stars could not get around nightly be ignored because the means to upset that mythological applecart are right at hand?? Itís simple really. Take one brimful cup of high-sounding but utterly fraudulent computer-programmed Virtual Reality Simulations (HERE), add four teaspoons of occult mathematics to fit the fantasies (HERE, p.9), pour in two shot glasses of an ancient anti-Bible religious agenda labeled NASAís "Origins Program" (HERE), stir ceaselessly and serve daily to all media and academic outlets with an air of breathless wonderment at what "science" is discovering. (Viola! Mass hallucinosis!) So, while there is no compelling scientific reason whatsoever for accepting a rotating, orbiting Earth, a stationary Sun and a Moon going backwards, etc, there is certainly a compelling "religious" reason for accepting all of that unobserved hypothetical chicanery...that edifice of assumptions! The Bible declares at least 67 times that it is the sun and not the Earth that moves (HERE). And the Biblical Model requires no assumptions for any of the phenomena in the "solar system". But if that observable, i.e., "scientific" evidence from the Bible is accepted, then one can not endorse the Rabbinic Big Bang Paradigm without knowingly endorsing the Kabbalic Religion behind that Paradigm, and without knowingly rejecting the stationary Earth Paradigm of the Bible. The buck stops right there....
One essential leg of that Kabbalic Paradigm is the Einsteinian "Relativity" concept which was used to counteract the non-moving Earth results from scores of Interferometer tests. Relativity is simply a diabolical tool for getting rid of the truth about anything; scientific, moral, whatever. In modern physics its absurdity is reduced to Einsteinís own "thought experiment" which concludes that movement can be deceptive and--carried to its ultimate--one can not say with finality whether it is a train or the train station that is moving! Momma mia! Give us a break!
Despite its utter factlessness then and today, the Copernican Model won out. Now our Earth is viewed as merely the product of accident-driven phenomena brought about by an explosion of a "cosmic egg", by eons of time, by gravity, and by chemical interactions spontaneously generating life from non-living matter(now being carried to its farcical zenith by the latest "Panspermia" mythology HERE.)
We are talking shameless trampling on unbendable true laws of science here, namely, the Second Law of Thermodynamics and the Law of Biogenesis. Remember: The Definition of "Science", i.e., "to know" from the Latin root "scire"..
As with the rest of the world, I was indoctrinated into that diabolic, nihilistic, cosmological fantasy masquerading as "science", and all the evolutionary baggage that goes with it. I believed it. I spread it. But no more, thank God!
Jew or Gentile, religious and non-religious: Do you want your mind freed from this masquerade of false science orchestrated by a few dead Rabbis and Rebbes?? Would you rather be back on Godís side with Moses & Company, Ltd?? If you would, go to the Bible for the Truth on this vital matter about the Origin of all that exists... and accept no substitutes or variations on what it says.***
[In keeping with all this, look next month 6/1/03) for a new link which expands upon the Seven Assumptions theme, focusing particularly on how the Seventh Assumption--alleged star distance--is really all that is holding the whole Kabbalic Kosmology together. Following that--July 7/1/03--a seven part series dealing with "The Size and Structure of the Universe According to the Bible and Non-Theoretical Science" is scheduled. That series will present Bible passages which explain why the universe is less than one light day thick, and why a limited number of stars can be claimed by modern cosmology to be trillions of stars in billions of galaxies. Indisputable facts from the real science of Optics certify the Biblical Model of a radically smaller universe being brazenly distorted by modern Kabbalist Kosmology masquerading as Space Science.]
***A recent link (July, '07) has further Kabbalist quotes admitting that Satan is the Pharisee g'd. (HERE)***
1 - Michael White, Isaac Newton: The Last Sorcerer, Helix Books, Addison-Wesley,Reading, MA,.í97. 2 - Himmelfarb, Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution, p.398.
3 - J. D. Bernal, Marx and Science, p.17.
4 - Nicholas of Cusa, http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/cusa.html.
5 - John Lear, Keplerís Dream, (Full text and notes, U. of CA, Berkeley & Los Angeles, 1965.
6 - http://www.twainquotes,com/Circumstantial.html.