The Similarities and Differences Between
the Humanist Religion and the Pharisee Religion
Relevant to “Evolution Science” and the U.S. Constitution
Concerning the evidence presented in GA HB 179, these facts are written to forestall any claim that the present legal status of the Humanist Religion should determine the status of the Pharisee Religion under the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. That Clause explicitly prohibits the use of the public treasury to further any religion and, as the evidence shows, the Pharisee Religion is in clear violation of “The Clause” and forces the Humanist Religion into the same category.
1) The Humanist Manifesto--the “bible” of the Humanist Religion--states plainly that Humanists rely on evolution theory for their belief about the origin of all that exists.1 Unless a Humanist is also a Kabbalist who is aware of its cosmology of 15 billion years of creation through “evolution” resulting from an explosion of a “substanceless substance”, (as Kabbalist physicist Gerald Schroeder has called it)2 he wouldn’t know the religious source for the evolution model in which he believes.
2) In 1961 the Supreme Court ruled in Torcaso v. Watkins 367 U.S. 4-88 that: “Secular Humanism is a non-theistic religion”. In other words, in order to grant “Humanism” a tax exemption as a Religion, the Court assigned it legal “religious” status. This decision was rendered on the basis of the Court having accepted the general consensus that Humanist philosophy rested on purely “secular science” called “evolution” which involved no supernatural entity or entities whatsoever.
3) Since being secular has always been the criterion for avoiding the strictures of the Establishment Clause, then, ipso facto, any religion which has an indisputable and universally recognized supernatural component can not be secular. Such a religion would have no reason to expect that it too could qualify for a “non-theistic” (i.e., “a-theistic”) status under the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution (or similar clauses in State Constitutions). Being “non-theistic/a-theistic”, the Humanist Religion was judged to be secular. Being “theistic”, the Pharisee Religion can not be judged to be secular. Many Kabbalists go to a synagogue to pray to a supernatural entity. Many put notes to g’d in the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem. Humanist atheists do not have meeting places to pray to a supernatural entity, nor do they acknowledge such an entity in any way. This difference between these two religions is beyond argument and comes to the fore over the matter of the funding of “evolution science”.
4) Just as the difference between the two religions is obvious, so the similarity is equally obvious. That similarity lies in the fact that both religions are equally dependent upon billions of years of evolution to account for the origin of the universe, the earth, and mankind. The Humanists believe that “evolution science” is wholly secular science and answers all questions about origins. The Court allowed that belief because no supernatural element had appeared in 1961. However, Rabbinic writings in the Kabbala--as long-hidden but now available evidence confirms--inform the world that this “holy book” of the Pharisee Sect of Judaism is not only the source of those billions of years indispensable to “evolution science”, it also incorporates all the concepts making up today’s cosmological Big Bang Evolutionary Paradigm. This is a religious “creation scenario” on all counts.
5) Since it is now known that both religions are dependent upon “evolution science” for their foundational origins doctrine, the legal question begging to be resolved is two fold: a) Can the Humanist Religion which has thus far been allowed to teach and promote “evolution science” as a “secular origins scenario” continue to maintain that legal status after the religious history of evolutionism is known to be part of a theistic religion? And, b) Can the “evolution science” of the theistic religion of Phariseeism be taught and promoted with public funds according to the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution?
6) Faced now with this real--and obviously far-reaching--decision, what choices do the Courts have under the Constitution? Once the evidence of the Kabbalic derivation of the evolution paradigm is confirmed, all options but one vanish. The Pharisee Religion is the sole originator of that 15 billion year long evolutionary paradigm which is taught and promoted everywhere today. That fact demands that “evolution science” be ruled in violation of the Establishment Clause and that no component of its sectarian “science” can henceforth be funded with tax money.
7) But what of the “theistic religion” status handed down by the Supreme Court in 1961 to the Humanists? At the time of that ruling, the consensus of scientific opinion was that “evolution science” was secular science. The revelation that “evolution science” was inscribed over a period of many centuries in a “holy book” of a major religion simply was not available at that time, nor indeed, until the late ‘90’s. So now that the source of the evolution model is known to be intimately and inextricably associated with the Pharisee Religion, can the Humanist Religion still use the model as its raison d’etre? Can it still claim to be “non-theistic” when the evolutionary heartbeat of its origins doctrine is known to be theistic? If the Court had access to the information in ’61 that it has now, it would have had no reason to ascribe “non-theistic” religious status to a belief known to have deep theistic roots.
The evidence confirming that religious roots of today’s “evolution science” is found in the Kabbala holy book of the Pharisee Religion dating back many centuries can be examined here:
http://www.fixedearth.com/kabbala%20II.htm
http://www.fixedearth.com/nasas_spiritual_roots.htm
http://www.fixedearth.com/kabbala%20VI.htm
http://www.fixedearth.com/HB%20179%20PART%2OII%20ATT.EVIDENCE.htm
http://www.fixedearth.com/HB%20179%20PART%20III%20ADDENDUM.htm
Bibliography
1 - http://www.americanhumanist.org/about/manifesto1.html
2 - Web Article: “The Age of the Universe” (Issues - Ash Ha Torah), pp. 12, 13
***
Contact: The Fair Education Foundation. Inc. - fefinc@hemc.net